Peer Review Process
International Journal of Economic Social and Technology (IJEST) implement each accepted manuscript will go through a review process by the Editor and reviewers, using a Double-blind Peer-Review Process, in which the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author did not know the identity of the reviewer.
International Journal of Economic Social and Technology (IJEST) implements policies Double-Blind Peer-Review, every manuscript received will be sent to Reviewers who registered in The Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen. The review process lasts a maximum of up to 30 (thirty) days with the allocation of time given to each reviewer to complete its review process being a maximum of ten (10) working days. If the partners designated bestari previously not able to finish his review work within the time limit specified then the chairman of the Chairman Editorial Board will appoint a replacement to do a review Reviewers manuscript.
In the review process, reviewers provide considerations relating to compatibility between the title, abstract, introduction, discussion (results), and conclusion. In addition, reviewer also give consideration associated with novelty, scientific impact, and references used
- Author submit the manuscript
- Editor Evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]
- Double-blind peer review process
- Editor Decision (Accepted Submission, Revisions Required, Resubmit For Review, Decline Submission)
- Confirmation to the authors
The final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers’ comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by the Editor in Chief by considering the sequence of accepted dates and geographical distribution of authors.